Comentários do leitor

Let's look at the benefits and drawbacks of rental and built-in donwload site

por Kaylene Velazquez (2021-06-18)


Let's consider the pros and cons of rental and built-in webhard.

Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This identifies something that shares idc's server resources with other users.

Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.

The rental type gets the advantage of having a server on idc, so it doesn't have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.

However, you should pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, pay for capacity and traffic costs, and P2P순위 move files to other servers.

There are disadvantages such as dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) and other domains.


Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic.

It has the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies usually do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not just a Webhard, it's a company.

It is because it is confidential and knows the energy of strategic sharing and well-managed data.


Link hard solutions have emerged in line with the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without the burden.
It does not need to purchase H/W separately, and the perfect solution is alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the required pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had an internet site or intranet, you can stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.

OK to set up installed blogs or bulletin boards.

By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the business's homepage in addition to the Webhard's original function, the idea of developing a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the solution.

The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, which can be fully built in Soho, therefore the parts that have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will be solved a lot.


It is now necessary for Soho to determine a web hard system.

Rental vs. Construction.


Webhard reminds you of an extremely useful and convenient Internet service that allows you to download files over the Internet at a fixed monthly cost. This means that the usage of web hard is becoming common.



But it's not just recently that this concept arrived, and it's true that it's been a long time. When it came out, lots of people used it, and there were many office workers who didn't sign up for it or even paid for their personal expenses because of lack of capacity, and you can find probably still some now.



The biggest background of the phenomenon may be the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as for example work used, while there are lots of burdens and inconveniences to pay monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. Furthermore, the service is provided contrary to the backdrop of a big portal, which also results in security concerns about the leakage of confidential information, which explains why the company refuses to adopt it.


In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server consists of a server (HW)+ operating system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses using the number of users), that is prohibitive compared to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.



NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anybody with significantly decrease the needs of these webhard users. Webhard is quite innovative since it supports uploading files automagically. It's a excellent feature because DDNS, etc. can be accessed from the outside and never have to buy an authorized IP.



Unfortunately, you can find functional limitations because the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. Because the word "basic" implies, it isn't a webhard solution developed at a higher cost. Consequently, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Of course, it is a paid option, but it is a very low-cost, very useful solution that's less than a tenth of the expense of building a single server.


Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low cost, developing a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll have a look at the rough top features of Webhard and guide you. It is possible to go over it and choose the best one based on the reality and needs.