THE (IN)HUMANITY OF THE MEDICAL EXAMINATION PROCEDUR IN DISABILITY BENEFITS: IMMUNITY LOGIC THAT REQUIRES FRATERNAL REFLEXIVITY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17058/rdunisc.vi73.19209

Abstract

The object of the research is the medical examination carried out by social security for the granting of disability benefits. The problem is the complexity of the procedure, which includes bureaucracy and analyses that demand time, resources, and result in disagreements, with great judicialization. How to promote an ecological reasoning in the protection of social rights of health and social security, to reduce the procedural iter to the benefit and reduce social vulnerability as well as conflicts? The hypothesis is that the health and social security subsystems can establish reliable systemic and fraternal communication to speed up the process of granting benefits due to work disability. The general objective of the research is to introduce Elígio Resta's metatheory of Fraternal Law as a procedural assumption for the analysis of the problem. As specific objectives (i) contextualize the current functioning of the social security system, especially the medical examination for obtaining disability benefits; (ii) demonstrate that the technique of bureaucracy and strict legality in the name of legal certainty causes inhuman treatment and judicialization; and (iii) present the metatheory of Fraternal Law as able to guide systemic ecological reasoning as a procedural assumption, softening the friend/enemy dichotomy. The research methodology contains a hypothetical-deductive epistemological process, as a method, quantitative and qualitative analysis and, as research techniques, systematic review of the literature and exploratory indirect data collection. The theoretical framework that permeates the entire development belongs to Niklas Luhmann's Theory of the Social System and to the contemporary Metatheory of Fraternal Law by Elígio Resta. As findings, it was found that there is a communicative mismatch between the subsystems of social security, health and social security, reflecting on the organizational culture of the friend-enemy relationship with the citizen, greatly impacting on the trust that results in inhumane treatment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Claudine Costa Smolenaars, UFRGS

Doutoranda em Direito na Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Mestre em Direito da Empresa e dos Negócios da UNISINOS/RS. Procuradora Federal na AGU. Vínculo com a UFRGS. E-mail: dinecosta@gmail.com. ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5428-0704

Daniela Regina Pellin, Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos

Pós-Doutora em Direito pela UFRGS/RS. Vínculo com a Unisinos. E-mail: dpellin@unisinos.br. ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0972-0085

Sandra Regina Martini, UNILASALLE

Pós-doutora em Direito pela Università Roma Tre e em Políticas Públicas pela Universidade de Salerno. Vínculo com a Unilasalle. E-mail: srmvial@terra.com.br; srmartinipoa@gmail.com.  https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5437-648X

Published

2024-09-19

How to Cite

Smolenaars, C. C. ., Pellin, D. R., & Martini, S. R. (2024). THE (IN)HUMANITY OF THE MEDICAL EXAMINATION PROCEDUR IN DISABILITY BENEFITS: IMMUNITY LOGIC THAT REQUIRES FRATERNAL REFLEXIVITY. Revista Do Direito, (73), 25-53. https://doi.org/10.17058/rdunisc.vi73.19209

Issue

Section

Artigos Originais