GOOD PRACTICES OF LAND USE AND OCCUPATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION: THE CASE OF THE WATER PROTECTOR PROGRAM OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF VERA CRUZ, RS, BRAZIL

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17058/rjp.v14i1.19270

Keywords:

Payments for environmental services, Land use and occupation, Watershed, Water resources

Abstract

Environmental Services (PES) programs and projects have proven to be an effective methodology in Brazil and other countries for the conservation and restoration of ecosystems, with different approaches, but especially in the recovery of degraded areas and the improvement of water quality and quantity in watersheds. The Water Protector Program implemented in the municipality of Vera Cruz is an example of a local PES program located in the center of the state of Rio Grande do Sul, in the Pardo basin, focusing its efforts and resources on the conservation and restoration of riparian areas of the Arroio Andréas sub-basin since 2011. Using QGIS, Google Earth, and data generated by the MapBiomas platform, the area was analyzed between the years 2011 and 2021, covering a 10-year period of program execution. The period under study highlights the increase in forest cover, by 2,165 hectares during this period, an aspect that may be associated with the actions of the Water Protector Program. This demonstrates how effective land use and occupation practices can protect water resources and promote environmental sustainability through legislation, public awareness, economic incentives, and cooperation among sectors. The Water Protector Program provides an inspiring model for other regions interested in preserving their natural resources. Good land use and occupation practices are essential for environmental preservation and sustainability.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ATTANASIO, CLÁUDIA M.; LIMA, WALTER DE P.; GANDOLFI, SERGIUS; ZAKIA, MARIA J. B.; JÚNIOR, JOSÉ C. T. V. Método para a identificação da zona ripária: microbacia hidrográfica do Ribeirão São João (Mineiros do Tietê, SP). Scientia Forestalis, n. 71. 2006. p. 131-140.

BRASIL. Lei Federal nº 14.119 de 13 de janeiro de 2021. Institui a Política Nacional de Pagamento por Serviços Ambientais. Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil. Brasília, DF, Edição 09, Seção 1, p. 07. 2021. (https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2019-2022/2021/lei/l14119.htm).

CHAN, K. M. A., ANDERSON, E., CHAPMAN, M., JESPERSENJ, K., & OLMSTED, P. (2017). Payments for Ecosystem Services: Rife With Problems and Potential—For Transformation Towards Sustainability. In Ecological Economics (Vol. 140, pp. 110–122). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.029

COHEN-SHACHAM, E., ANDRADE, A., DALTON, J., DUDLEY, N., JONES, M., KUMAR, C., MAGINNIS, S., MAYNARD, S., NELSON, C. R., RENAUD, F. G., WELLING, R., & WALTERS, G. (2019). Core principles for successfully implementing and upscaling Nature-based Solutions. In Environmental Science and Policy (Vol. 98, pp. 20–29). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.04.014

COLLISCHON, W., & DORNELLES, F. (2013). Hidrologia para engenharia e ciências ambientais. Associação Brasileira de Recursos Hídricos (ABRH).

CORCORAN, E., NELLENMANN, C., BAKER, E., BOS, R., OSBORN, D. AND SAVELLI, H. (eds) (2010). Sick

Water? The central role of wastewater management in sustainable development. United

Nations Environment Programme, UN-HABITAT, GRID-Arendal

COSTANZA, R., DE GROOT, R., SUTTON, P., VAN DER PLOEG, S., ANDERSON, S. J., KUBISZEWSKI, I., FARBER, S., & TURNER, R. K. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26(1), 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002

Dalton, J. and Murti, R. (2013). Utilizing Integrated Water Resource Management Approaches to Support Disaster Risk Reduction. In K. Sudmeier-Rieux and M. Estrella (eds.) The Role of Ecosystems in Disaster Risk Reduction. Bonn, Germany: United NationsUniversity Press.

ENGEL, S., PAGIOLA, S., & WUNDER, S. (2008). Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues. Ecological Economics, 65(4), 663–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011

GOLDMAN-BENNER, R.L., BENITEZ, S., BOUCHER, T., CALVACHE, A., DAILY, G., KAREIVA, P.,

KROEGER, T., RAMOS, A., 2012. Water funds and payments for ecosystem services:

practice learns from theory and theory can learn from practice. Oryx 46, 55–63.

GORELICK, N; HANCHER, M.; DIXON, M.; ILYUSHCHENKO, S; THAU, D.; MOORE, R. Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment, v. 202, p. 18–27, 2017.

HASAN, SHAIKH S.; ZHEN, LIN; MIAH, MD. GIASHUDDIN; AHAMED, TOFAYEL; SAMIE, ABDUS. Impact of land use change on ecosystem services: A review. Environmental Development, v. 34. 2020.

JUNIOR, P. C. D. Curso básico de geoprocessamento para redes de saneamento com a utilização do software livre QGIS. 2018. 96p. Natal- Rio Grande do Norte.

LOZANO-BAEZ, S. E., COOPER, M., FERRAZ, S. F. DE B., RODRIGUES, R. R., CASTELLINI, M., & DE PRIMA, S. (2019). Recovery of soil hydraulic properties for assisted passive and active restoration: Assessing historical land use and forest structure. Water (Switzerland), 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/w11010086

LURIE, S., BENNETT, D. E., DUNCAN, S., GOSNELL, H., HUNTER, M. L., MORZILLO, A. T., MOSELEY, C., NIELSEN-PINCUS, M., PARKER, R., & WHITE, E. M. (2013). PES marketplace development at the local scale: The Eugene Water and Electric Board as a local watershed services marketplace driver. Ecosystem Services, 6, 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.09.005

MCDONALD, R.I., AND SHEMIE, D., 2014. Urban Water Blueprint: Mapping conservation solutions to the global water challenge. Washington, D.C.

MELLO, K. DE, FENDRICH, A. N., SPAROVEK, G., SIMMONDS, J. S., MARON, M., TAVARES, P. A., BRITES, A. D., RODRIGUES, R. R., JOLY, C. A., & METZGER, J. P. (2021). Achieving private conservation targets in Brazil through restoration and compensation schemes without impairing productive lands. Environmental Science and Policy, 120, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.02.014

PISSARRA, T. C. T., SANCHES FERNANDES, L. F., & PACHECO, F. A. L. (2021). Production of clean water in agriculture headwater catchments: A model based on the payment for environmental services. Science of the Total Environment, 785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147331

SANTOS JÚNIOR V. J.; PRADO R. B.; LIMA E. de P. L “Valoração de Serviço Ambiental Hídrico na Zona de Amortecimento de um Parque Estadual no Seminário de Minas Gerais, Brasil” – Artigo - Revista Gestão e Sustentabilidade Ambiental., v. 11, n. 2, p. 104-143, jun. 2022.

SMITH, M. (2013). Water for Nature, Nature for Water. The Post 2015 Water Thematic Consultation - Water Resources Management Stream Framing Paper. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.

TANIWAKI, R. H., CASSIANO, C. C., FILOSO, S., FERRAZ, S. F. DE B., CAMARGO, P. B. DE, & MARTINELLI, L. A. (2017). Impacts of converting low-intensity pastureland to high-intensity bioenergy cropland on the water quality of tropical streams in Brazil. Science of the Total Environment, 584–585, 339–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.150

TNC – THE NATURE CONSERVANCY - Guia para a formulação de políticas públicas estaduais e municipais de pagamento por serviços ambientais. 2017

UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME (UNEP). 2021. Becoming #GenerationRestoration: Ecosystem restoration for people, nature and climate [online]. Nairobi. [Cited 10 August 2021]. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/36251/ERPNC.pdf

VILLAMAYOR-TOMAS, S., HERMANN, A., VAN DER LINGEN, L., & HAYES, T. (2022). Community-based water markets and collective payment for ecosystem services: toward a theory of community-based environmental markets. In Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (Vol. 59). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2022.101221

VOGL, A. L., GOLDSTEIN, J. H., DAILY, G. C., VIRA, B., BREMER, L., MCDONALD, R. I., SHEMIE, D., TELLMAN, B., & CASSIN, J. (2017). Mainstreaming investments in watershed services to enhance water security: Barriers and opportunities. Environmental Science and Policy, 75, 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.05.007

ZANELLA, MATHEUS A.; CHRISTIAN SCHLEYER; STIJN SPEELMANC. Why do farmers join Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes? An Assessment of PES water scheme participation in Brazil.

Published

2024-07-08

How to Cite

Roberto Kuester, W., & Kronbauer, M. (2024). GOOD PRACTICES OF LAND USE AND OCCUPATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION: THE CASE OF THE WATER PROTECTOR PROGRAM OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF VERA CRUZ, RS, BRAZIL. Revista Jovens Pesquisadores, 14(1), 22-35. https://doi.org/10.17058/rjp.v14i1.19270

Issue

Section

CIÊNCIAS EXATAS, DA TERRA E ENGENHARIAS