COERCION PRACTICES IN EDUCATION: WHAT THE TEACHERS SAY AND DO

Authors

  • Rosina Forteski Glidden
  • Ivan Gross

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17058/rea.v24i1.4264

Keywords:

sychology, Education, Speaking And Non-Speaking Correspondence, Coercive Practices

Abstract

In the context of teacher formation the use of coercion is criticized, but in practice the teacher seems to make use of such strategies and ignore alternatives for interaction and teaching practices. The objective of this work was checking the correspondence between the description and the practice of coercion events in the student-teacher interaction with four Elementary-School female teachers in a public school. To do that, a combined methodology was used: questionnaire and direct observation. The results showed the occurrence of a level of non-correspondence between what they say and what they do in all participants. The conclusion points to the need, as shown by the literature, to focus on the analysis of the behaviors in relation to what is reported in the same reality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Rosina Forteski Glidden

Psicóloga, Mestranda em Educação pela Universidade Federal do Paraná. Endereço: Rua Guilherme Pugsley, 1158, Água Verde, Curitiba, PR, Brasil. Cep: 80.620-000. Endereço eletrônico: rsforteski@gmail.com

Ivan Gross

Psicólogo, Mestre em Educação pela Universidade Tuiuti do Paraná. Endereço: Rua Ubaldino do Amaral, 165, apto 408, Alto da Glória, Curitiba, PR, Brasil, Cep: 80.060-195. Endereço eletrônico: ivangross@yahoo.com.br

Published

2016-04-28

How to Cite

Glidden, R. F., & Gross, I. (2016). COERCION PRACTICES IN EDUCATION: WHAT THE TEACHERS SAY AND DO. Reflexão E Ação, 24(1), 402-424. https://doi.org/10.17058/rea.v24i1.4264