Public and private: dichotomy, confusion or complementarity in the implementation of rights and principles.

Abstract

The distinction between public and private was and is sometimes taken by antagonistic, however different their characterization does not represent tension and dichotomy assumption of the existence of the rights taken for public and private, these conditions have distinct features just a different case studies, briefly peculiar action plaintiffs. While recognizing that the most basic meaning of public and private spheres is that there are things that should be hidden and others that should be exposed in public so they can acquire some form of existence in order to achieve rights and principles, such as advertising and privacy, once noting the public interest, it is certainly possible to have the maintenance and perpetuation of the public sphere, private and social.