Un análisis epidemiológico de las infecciones urinarias por Candida spp. en la unidad de cuidados intensivos

Autores/as

  • Fahriye Ekşi
  • Ban Ali Hassan
  • Berna Kaya Uğur
  • Hamit Yıldız
  • Mehmet Erinmez Gaziantep University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Microbiology
  • Süleyman Ganidağlı

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17058/reci.v12i2.17026

Resumen

El hallazgo de especies de Candida en la orina es un hallazgo habitual y se denomina candiduria. Hay un aumento en la frecuencia de infecciones del tracto urinario (ITU) causadas por Candida, especialmente en pacientes críticamente enfermos. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo determinar las características epidemiológicas, clínicas y micológicas de las infecciones urinarias por Candida en la unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI) y la susceptibilidad antifúngica. Métodos: Se evaluaron urocultivos de 394 pacientes de UCI con sospecha clínica de ITU. Después de 24-48 horas de incubación, las colonias parecían crecer como levadura, se examinaron morfológicamente mediante tinción de Gram. Las cepas de Candida que crecieron 104 ≥ UFC / ml en urocultivos se aceptaron como candiduria. Las susceptibilidades de las cepas de Candida a la anfotericina B, itraconazol, fluconazol, voriconazol, flucitosina y caspofungina se investigaron con el método de microdilución en caldo. Resultados: La distribución de las cepas 100 urinarias aisladas de Candida fue de, 54 C. albicans, 34 C. glabrata, 7 C. tropicalis, 2 C. kefyr, 2 C. lusitaniae y 1 como C. parapsilosis. Entre las 100 especies de Candida aisladas en nuestro estudio, las tasas de susceptibilidad de anfotericina B, flucitosina, caspofungina, fluconazol, itraconazol y voriconazol fueron 100%, 100%, 91%, 23%, 13%, 25,8%, respectivamente. Conclusión: La identificación precisa de Candida spp., así como la investigación de la susceptibilidad antifúngica, será beneficiosa en términos de la eficacia del tratamiento y la prevención del desarrollo de resistencias.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Gajdács M, Dóczi I, Ábrók M, et al. Epidemiology of candiduria and Candida urinary tract infections in inpatients and outpatients: results from a 10-year retrospective survey. Cent European J Urol. 2019;72(2):209-214. https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2019.1909

Hollenbach E. To treat or not to treat--critically ill patients with candiduria. Mycoses. 2008;51(2):12-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0507.2008.01570.x

Kauffman CA, Vazquez JA, Sobel JD, et al. Prospective multicenter surveillance study of funguria in hospitalized patients. The National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Mycoses Study Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30(1):14-18. https://doi.org/10.1086/313583

Bougnoux ME, Kac G, Aegerter P, et al. Candidemia and candiduria in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units in France: incidence, molecular diversity, management and outcome. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(2):292-299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-007-0865-y

Fisher JF, Sobel JD, Kauffman CA, et al. Candida urinary tract infections--treatment. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(Suppl 6):457-66. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir112

Fisher JF. Candida urinary tract infections--epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment: executive summary. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(Suppl 6):429-32. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir108

Kauffman CA. Candiduria. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:371–6. https://doi.org/10.1086/430918

Alvarez-Lerma F, Nolla-Salas J, León C, et al. Candiduria in critically ill patients admitted to intensive care medical units. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29(7):1069-1076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-1807-y

Sobel JD, Fisher JF, Kauffman CA, et al. Candida urinary tract infections--epidemiology. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(Suppl 6):433-6. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir109

Alfouzan WA. Epidemiological study on species identification and susceptibility profile of Candida in urine. Fungal Genom Biol. 2015;5:124. https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-8056.1000124

Achkar JM, Fries BC. Candida infections of the genitourinary tract. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23(2):253-273. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00076-09

Jamil S, Jamil N, Saad U, et al. Frequency of Candida albicans in Patients with Funguria. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2016;26(2):113-116.

Sakamoto Y, Kawabe K, Suzuki T, et al. Species Distribution of Candidemia and Their Susceptibility in a Single Japanese University Hospital: Prior Micafungin Use Affects the Appearance of Candida parapsilosis and Elevation of Micafungin MICs in Non-parapsilosis Candida Species. J Fungi (Basel). 2021;7(8):596. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7080596

He Z, Huo X, Lei D, et al. Management of candiduria in hospitalized patients: a single-center study on the implementation of IDSA guidelines and factors affecting clinical decisions. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021;40(1):59-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-020-03999-1

Denis B, Chopin D, Piron P, et al. Candiduria in kidney transplant recipients: Is antifungal therapy useful?. Mycoses. 2018;61(5):298-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.12740

Sobel JD, Kauffman CA, McKinsey D. Candiduria: a randomized, double-blind study of treatment with fluconazole and placebo. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) Mycoses Study Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;30(1):19-24. https://doi.org/10.1086/313580

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; approved Standard-third edition. CLSI document M27-A3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, Pennsylvania 2008.

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; third informational supplement CLSI document M27-S3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, Pennsylvania 2008.

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; fourth informational supplement CLSI document M27-S4. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, Pennsylvania 2012.

Wang K, Hsueh K, Kronen R, et al. Creation and assessment of a clinical predictive model for candidaemia in patients with candiduria. Mycoses. 2019;62(7):554-561. https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.12917

García-Agudo L, Rodríguez-Iglesias M, Carranza-González R. Approach of clinicians to candiduria and related outcome in the elderly. J Mycol Med. 2018;28(3):428-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycmed.2018.05.011

He Z, Su C, Bi Y, et al. Evaluation of a Novel Laboratory Candiduria Screening Protocol in the Intensive Care Unit. Infect Drug Resist. 2021;14:489-496. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S289885

He Z, Liu Y, Wang T, et al. Candiduria in hospitalized patients: an investigation with the Sysmex UF-1000i urine analyzer. PeerJ. 2019;7:e6935. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6935

Aghili SR, Abastabar M, Soleimani A, Haghani I, Azizi S. High prevalence of asymptomatic nosocomial candiduria due to Candida glabrata among hospitalized patients with heart failure: a matter of some concern?. Curr Med Mycol. 2020;6(4):1-8. https://doi.org/10.18502/cmm.6.4.5327

##submission.downloads##

Publicado

2022-08-15

Cómo citar

Ekşi, F., Ali Hassan, B., Kaya Uğur, B., Yıldız, H., Erinmez, M., & Ganidağlı, S. (2022). Un análisis epidemiológico de las infecciones urinarias por Candida spp. en la unidad de cuidados intensivos. Revista De Epidemiologia E Controle De Infecção, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.17058/reci.v12i2.17026

Número

Sección

ARTIGO ORIGINAL