Missing in action and lost in thought: a grassroots implementation of genre pedagogy by practitioner researchers in an English language classroom for adults

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17058/signo.v46i86.15904

Palavras-chave:

genre pedagogy, practitioner research, Reading to Learn, classroom research

Resumo

This paper reports on the grass roots adoption of a methodology for teaching reading and writing based on genre theory (Martin and Rose, 2012; Rose and Martin, 2012) in English for general purposes classes at an English language teaching (ELT) centre at an Australian university. We report on teachers’ experiences on using genre pedagogy, informed and inspired by the Reading to Learn (R2L) program and genre pedagogy from the so-called ‘Sydney School’ (Martin & Rose, 2007; Martin & Rose, 2008; Rose & Martin, 2012). We report on how we introduced elements of the R2L program into our lessons using a ‘bottom up’ approach with the view that individual teachers might find this useful for implementation of this methodology in their own contexts. We found that genre pedagogy can be adopted by teachers and implemented at the classroom level despite such challenges as teachers learning new classroom practices and reconciling differences with previous classroom practices.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Andrew Glencairn Scott, The University of Queensland; Lancaster University

AG Scott is a TESOL teacher and teacher trainer at The University of Queensland in Australia and a PhD candidate at Lancaster University, U.K.

Tanja Hafenstein, The University of Queensland

Tanja Hafenstein is passionate about helping students connect in meaningful ways both inside and outside of the classroom. She is currently a TESOL Language Teacher and Teacher Trainer at the Institute of Continuing and TESOL Education, The University of Queensland, Australia. She loves collaborating and has enjoyed presenting with her collaborators at IATEFL (UK), CamTESOL (Cambodia), and in Australia.

Referências

Allwright, D. (1997). Quality and sustainability in teacher-research. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 368-370.

Allwright, D., & Bailey, K. (1991). Focus on the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Allwright, D., & Hanks, J. (2009). The developing language learner: An introduction to Exploratory Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Barton, D. (2005). Teacher researchers. Reflect, (2), 33.

Borg, S., & Sanchez, H. (2015a). Key issues in doing and supporting language teacher research. In S. Borg & H. Sanchez (Eds.), International Perspectives on teacher research (pp.1-13). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Borg, S. & Sanchez, H. (2015b). Teacher research: Looking back and moving forward. In S. Borg & H. Sanchez (Eds.), International Perspectives on teacher research (pp.185-193). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

British Association of Applied Linguists (BAAL) (2016). The British Association for Applied Linguistics: Recommendations on good practice in Applied Linguistics. Retrieved from http://www.baal.org.uk/goodpractice_full_2016.pdf

Burns, A. (2009). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. Routledge.

Cambridge Assessment English (2016). Cambridge English Trainer Framework. Retrieved from https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/Images/297312-cambridge-english-trainer-framework.pdf

Council of Europe. 2001a. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Christie, F. & Martin J. R. (Eds.) 1997. Genre and Institutions: social processes in the workplace and school. London: Cassell (Open Linguistics Series).

Christie, F. 2002. Classroom Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.

Cope, W. & M. Kalantzis (Eds.) 1993. The Powers of Literacy: a genre approach to teaching literacy. London: Falmer & Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Hamilton, M. (2006). Practitioner research: just a fling or a long-term relationship? Reflect, 6, 14-18.

Hamilton, M., Davies, P., & James, K. (2007). Practitioners leading research. London: NRDC.

Martin, J. R. (1999). Mentoring semogenesis: ‘genre-based’ literacy pedagogy. In F. Christie (ed.), Pedagogy and the Shaping of Consciousness: Linguistic and Social Processes, (pp. 123–155). London: Cassell (Open Linguistics Series). (Reprinted in 2012 in Z. Wang (ed.). Language in Education, Vol. 7 in the Collected Papers of J. R. Martin (pp. 224–54). Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press).

Martin, J. R. (2009). Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education, 20(1), 10-21.

Martin, J.R. & Rose, D. (2007). Working with Discourse: meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum

Martin, J.R. & Rose, D. (2008). Genre Relations: mapping culture. London: Equinox.

Rolfe, G., Freshwater, D., Jasper, M. (2001) Critical reflection in nursing and the helping professions: a user’s guide. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Rose, D. (2008). Writing as linguistic mastery: The development of genre-based literacy pedagogy. In R. Beard, D. Myhill, J. Riley and M. Nystrand (eds.). Handbook of writing development (pp. 151-66). London: Sage.

Rose, D. (2011) Genre in the Sydney school. In J. Gee and M. Hanford (eds.). The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 209-225). London: Routledge.

Rose, D. (2015). New developments in genre-based pedagogy. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham and J. Fitzgerald (eds.), Handbook of writing research, (pp.227-42). New York: Guildford.

Rose, David. (2017). Languages of Schooling: embedding literacy learning with genre-based pedagogy. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 1-31.

Rose, D (2018) Reading to learn: Accelerating learning and closing the gap. Sydney: Reading to Learn. http://readingtolearn.com.au

Rose, D. (2020) Building a pedagogic metalanguage I: Curriculum genres. In J. R. Martin, K. Maton & Y. J. Doran, (Eds.)., (2020). Accessing Academic Discourse: Systemic Functional Linguistics and Legitimation Code Theory. Routledge.

Rose, D. & J. R. Martin 2012. Learning to Write, Reading to Learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. London: Equinox

Rothery, J. (1994). Exploring literacy in school English (Write it right resources for literacy learning), Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged School Program.

Rothery, J. (1996). Making changes: developing an educational linguistics. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.) Literacy in Society (pp. 86–123). London: Longman.

Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158

Schmidt, R. W. (2001). Attention, cognition and second language instruction. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp.3-32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schön, D. (1983) The reflective practitioner. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

Shulman, L. (1987a). Further Comment: Sounding an Alarm: A Reply to Sockett. Harvard Educational Review, 57(4), 473-484.

Rolfe, G., Freshwater, D., Jasper, M. (2001) Critical reflection in nursing and the helping professions: a user’s guide. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

University of Connecticut, Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning (n.d.). What? So what? Now what? Model. Retrieved from https://cetl.uconn.edu/what-so-what-now-what-model/#

van Lier, L. (1994). Forks and Hope: Pursuing understanding in different ways. Applied Linguistics, 15(3), 328-345.

Wallace, M. J. (1991). Training foreign language teachers: A reflective approach. Cambridge: CUP.

Downloads

Publicado

2021-05-21

Como Citar

Scott, A. G., & Hafenstein, T. (2021). Missing in action and lost in thought: a grassroots implementation of genre pedagogy by practitioner researchers in an English language classroom for adults. Signo, 46(86), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.17058/signo.v46i86.15904

Edição

v. 46 n. 86 (2021)

Seção

v. 46, número 86: Programa Ler para Aprender (PLA) e suas potencialidades

Licença

Declaro(amos) que o artigo submetido é pessoal, inédito, não representando reprodução, ainda que parcial, de obras de terceiros, assumindo a responsabilidade por todas as colocações e conceitos emitidos, bem como também autorizo(amos) sua publicação pela revista Signo, Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul. Declaro(amos) exonerar a APESC/UNISC de todas e quaisquer responsabilidades, e indenizá-la por perdas e danos que venha a sofrer em caso de contestação (da originalidade e dos conceitos e ideias); Declaro(amos), caso o artigo seja aceito e publicado pela revista Signo, a cedência e transferência de forma definitiva e perpétua, irrevogável e irretratável, para a APESC, dos seus direitos autorais patrimoniais referentes ao artigo denominado nesta declaração, para utilização da APESC em finalidade educacional. Concordo(amos) e estou(amos) ciente(s) de que a publicação eletrônica é de livre acesso, regida com uma Licença Os autores que publicam na Signo retêm os direitos autorais de seu trabalho, licenciando-o sob a Creative Commons Attribution License que permite que os artigos sejam reutilizados e redistribuídos sem restrições, desde que o trabalho original seja corretamente citado. A Signo é propriedade da Associação Pró-Ensino em Santa Cruz do Sul e hospeda na plataforma Open Journal System. Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.

Licença Creative Commons