Psicologia social e fake news: a perspectiva do realismo crítico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17058/signo.v47i90.17849Palavras-chave:
Fake News, Psicologia social, Realismo crítico, Heurísticas, ViesesResumo
Este artigo é o desdobramento de uma comunicação lida na mesa redonda “A psicologia na luta contra a desinformação”, proposta pela Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia e realizada na 74a Reunião Anual da Sociedade Brasileira Para o Progresso da Ciência. A temática comum à comunicação, e ao artigo aqui apresentado, é a das fake news e, em um sentido mais amplo, o uso da desinformação como um recurso de persuasão. Defendemos o argumento de que as fake news devem ser interpretadas como um fenômeno real, complexo e, como tal, apreensível nas condições concretas que presidem as manifestações de qualquer evento real. Para entendê-las devemos a) identificar o que é fake news, diferenciando-as de fenômenos similares e análogos; b) reconhecer que, por se tratar de um fenômeno real, deve ser analisada em consonância com perspectivas teóricas que permitam considerá-la na sua complexidade; c) uma vez entendidas como fenômenos reais e analisados segundo uma perspectiva ao mesmo tempo realista e crítica, consideramos a possibilidade de analisá-las segundo a perspectiva da psicologia social, a partir da constituição de um corpus; e d) apresentaremos algumas sugestões, decorrentes dos argumentos assinalados nas seções anteriores, que ofereçam indicadores de como podemos enfrentar a enxurrada de desinformações as quais estamos sujeitos em função das demandas impostas pelo desenvolvimento tecnológico atual e pela crescente polarização política.
Downloads
Referências
Albarracín, D. (2020). Conspiracy beliefs: Knowledge, ego-defense, and social integration. In R. Greifeneder, M. Jaffé, E. J. Newman, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation (pp. 196–219). Routledge.
Almenar, E., Aran-Ramspott, S., Suau, J., & Masip, P (2021). Gender Differences in Tackling Fake News: Different Degrees of Concern, but Same ProblemsMedia and Commiunication, 9, 1, 229-238, https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v9i1.3523
Altay, S., Hacquin, A.-S., & Mercier, H. (2022). Why do so few people share fake news? It hurts their reputation. New Media & Society, 24(6), 1303–1324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820969893
Altay, S., Majima, Y., & Mercier, H. (2020). Happy Thoughts: The Role of Communion in Accepting and Sharing Misbeliefs. PsyArXiv, https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/3s4nr
Anagnostopoulos, A., Bessi, A., Caldarelli, G., Del Vicario, M., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Zollo, F., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2014).Viral Misinformation: The Role of Homophily and Polarization. ArXiv:1411.2893. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1411.2893
Anderson, C. (2021) Fake News is Not a Virus: On Platforms and Their Effects, Communication Theory, 31, 1, 42–61, https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaa008
Anderson, C. A., Lepper, M. R., & Ross, L. (1980). Perseverance of social theories:
The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1037–1049.
Archer, M. (2000) Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge University Press.
Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology. Prentice-Hall, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1037/10025-000
Axt, J. R., Landau, M. J., & Kay, A. C. (2020). The Psychological Appeal of Fake-News Attributions. Psychological science, 31(7), 848–857. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620922785
Bacon, F. (2014). Novum Organom. Edipro.
Barbey, A. K., & Sloman, S. A. (2007). Base-rate respect: From ecological rationality to dual processes. The Behavioral and brain sciences, 30(3), 241–297. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X07001653
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
BBC.(2022) A brief history of fake news. https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/articles/zwcgn9q. Retrieved in 04 de julho de 2022.
Bernecker, A. Floweree & T. Grundmann (2021) Introduction. Em S. Bernecker, A. Floweree & T. Grundmann (Eds). The Epistemology of Fake New. Oxford Press. pp. 1-16.
Bhaskar, R (1978). A realist theory of science. Leeds Books.
__________ (1986). Scientific realism and human emancipation. Verso.
__________ (2014)Foreground. Em P. Edwards, J. O’ Mahoney & S. Vincent. Studying organizations using critical realism. A practical guide. Oxford Press (pp.iv-xv)
__________ (2016). Enlightened common sense. The philosophy of critical realism. Routledge.
Brashier, N. M., Umanath, S., Cabeza, R., & Marsh, E. J. (2017). Competing cues: Older adults rely on knowledge in the face of fluency. Psychology and Aging, 32(4), 331–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000156
Bronstein, M. V., Pennycook, G., Bear, A., Rand, D. G., & Cannon, T. D. (2019). Belief
in fake news is associated with delusionality, dogmatism, religious fundamentalism,
and reduced analytic thinking. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition,
(1), 108–117.
Bruner, J. S., & Goodman, C. C. (1947). Value and need as organizing factors in perception. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 42(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0058484
Cantril, H. (1940). Invasion from Mars: A study in the psychology of panic. Princeton University Press.
Coady, D. (2021). The fake news about fake news. Em S. Bernecker, A. Floweree & T. Grundmann (Eds). The Epistemology of Fake New. Oxford Press. pp. 68-81.
Coates, A., Muller, T., & Sirur, S. (2021). Simulating the Impact of Personality on Fake News. Em R. Falcone, J. Zhang, & D. Wang (Eds.). Proceedings of the 22nd International Workshop on Trust in Agent Societies. http://ceur-ws.org
Collier, A. (1994). Critical Realism An Introduction to Roy Bhaskars Philosophy. Verso.
Corneille, O., Mierop, A., & Unkelbach, C. (2020). Repetition increases both the perceived truth and fakeness of information: An ecological account. Cognition, 205, 104470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104470
Cromby, J. (2015) Feeling Bodies: Embodying Psychology. London: Palgrave.
Danermark, B., Ekström, M., Jakobsen, L. & Karlsson, J. (1997). Explaining Society. Critical realism in the social sciences. Routledge.
Dechêne, A., Stahl, C., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2010). The truth about the truth: a meta-analytic review of the truth effect. Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 14(2), 238–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309352251
De Keersmaecker, J., Dunning, D., Pennycook, G., Rand, D. G., Sanchez, C., Unkelbach, C., & Roets, A. (2020). Investigating the Robustness of the Illusory Truth Effect Across Individual Differences in Cognitive Ability, Need for Cognitive Closure, and Cognitive Style. Personality & social psychology bulletin, 46(2), 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219853844
DePaulo, B. M., Kashy, D. A., Kirkendol, S. E., Wyer, M. M., & Epstein, J. A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 979–995. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.979
Dordevic, M., & Safieddine, F. (2020). Variable Identification and Approaches to Validating Fake News. In Y. Ibrahim, & F. Safieddine (Eds) Fake News in an Era of Social Media: Tracking Viral Contagion, Rowland and
Littlefield. p.133
Dweck, C. (2012). Implicit Theories. Em P. Lange, A. Kruglanski, & E. Higgins (Eds). Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology. Sage.
Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2006). The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic: why the adjustments are insufficient. Psychological science, 17(4), 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01704.x
Evans, J., & Stanovich, K. (2013). Dual-Process theories of higher cognition: advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 3, 223-241.
Farmer, L. (2021). Fake news in context. Routledge.
Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N. M., Payne, B. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2015). Knowledge does not protect against illusory truth. Journal of experimental psychology. General, 144(5), 993–1002. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000098
Fine, G. A. (1978). The war of the worlds broadcast: Credibility ai the news frame. Michigan Sociological Review, 5, 1–11. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44952582
Fiske, S., & Taylor, S. (1991). Social cognition. 2nd. Ed. Addison-Wesley Pub.
Forgas, J. P., & East, R. (2008). On being happy and gullible: Mood effects on skepticism and the detection of deception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1362–1367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.010
Forgas, J., & Baumeister, R. (2019) Homo credulus. On the social psychology of gullibility. Em The J. Forgas & R. Baumeister (Eds.) The Social Psychology of Gullibility: Conspiracy Theories, Fake News and Irrational Beliefs
Gelfert, A. (2018). Fake News: A Definition. Informal Logic, 38, 1, 84–117. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v38i1.5068
Giansiracusa, N. (2021) How Algorithms Create and Prevent Fake News. Exploring the Impacts of Social Media, Deepfakes, GPT-3, and More. Apress.
Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review
of Psychology, 62, 451–482. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346
Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.2.107
Gilbert, D. T., Krull, D. S., & Malone, P. S. (1990). Unbelieving the unbelievable: Some problems in the rejection of false information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(4), 601–613. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.601
Gilbert, D. T., Tafarodi, R. W., & Malone, P. S. (1993). You can't not believe everything you read. Journal of personality and social psychology, 65(2), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.65.2.221
Gilovich, T., R. Vallone, & Tversky, A. (1985). "he hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 295-314.
Greenspan, S. (2008). Annals of Gullibility:Why We Get Duped and How to Avoid. Praeger.
Groenendyk, E. (2018), Competing Motives in a Polarized Electorate: Political Responsiveness, Identity Defensiveness, and the Rise of Partisan Antipathy. Political Psychology, 39: 159-171. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12481
Gruen, Erich (2011). Rethinking the other in antiquity. Princeton University Press.
Habgood-Coote, J. (2019) Stop talking about fake news!. Inquiry, 62:9-10, 1033-1065, DOI: 10.1080/0020174X.2018.1508363
Harari, Y. N. (2020). Sapiens. Uma breve história da humanidade. Companhia das Letras.
Hartwig, M (2007). Dictionary of critical realism. Routledge.
Heider, F. (1970). Psicologia das relações interpessoais. (tradução: Dante Moreira Leite). Pioneira.
Henkel, L. A., & Mattson, M. E. (2011). Reading is believing: The truth effect and
source credibility. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1705–1721.
Henrich, J. & Muthukrishna, M. (2021). The origins and psychology of human cooperation. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 24.1–24.34.
Hertwig, R., & Engel, C. (2016). Homo Ignorans: Deliberately Choosing Not to Know. Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 11(3), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616635594
Hilbig, B. E. (2009). Sad, thus true: Negativity bias in judgments of truth. Journal of
Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 983–986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.012
Jablonski, N. (2012). Living color: the biological and social meaning of skin color. University of California Press.
Jacoby, L. L., & Rhodes, M. G. (2006). False Remembering in the Aged. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(2), 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00405.x
Jaster, R., & Lanius, D. (2021). Speaking of Fake News. Definitions and Dimensions. Em S. Bernecker, A. Floweree & T. Grundmann (Eds). The Epistemology of Fake New. Oxford Press. pp. 19-45.
Jayakumar, S., Ang, B., & Anwar, N. (2021). Disinformation and fake news. Palgrave Macmillan.
Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336–355.
Herzstein, R. E. (1978). The war that Hitler won: The most infamous propaganda campaign in history (Vol. 1977). New York: Putnam Publishing Group.
Jang, S. M., & Kim, J. K. (2018). Third person effects of fake news: Fake news regulation
and media literacy interventions. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 295–302.
Kallis, A. (2005). Nazi propaganda and the second world war. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kin, B., Xiong, A., Lee. D., & Han K.(2021) A systematic review on fake news research through the lens of news creation and consumption: Research efforts, challenges, and future directions. PLoS ONE 16(12): e0260080. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260080
Krech, D., & Crutchfield, R. S. (1948). Theory and problems of social psychology. McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.1037/10024-000
Lahby, M., Pathan, A., Yassine, M., & Yafooz, W (2022). Combating Fake News with Computational Intelligence Techniques. Springer.
Lazer, D., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., Schudson, M., Sloman, S. A., Sunstein, C. R., Thorson, E. A., Watts, D. J., & Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science (New York, N.Y.), 359(6380), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
Lees, J., & Cikara, M. (2021) Understanding and combating misperceived polarization. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Soiety B 376: 20200143. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0143
Leman, P. J., & Cinnirella, M. (2013). Beliefs in conspiracy theories and the need for cognitive closure. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 378. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00378
Loersch, C. & Payne, B. (2011). The situated inference model: an integrative account of the effects of primes on perception, behavior, and motivation. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 6, 3, 234-252. doi:10.1177/1745691611406921.
Lyons, B., Merola, V., & Reifler, J. (2020). How bad is the fake news problem? The role of baseline information in public perceptions. In R. Greifeneder, M. Jaffé, E. J. Newman, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation (pp. 11–26). London: Routledge.
Malle, B. (1999). How people explain behavior: a new theoretical framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 1, 23-48.
_______ (2004). How the mind explains behavior. Folk explanations, meaning, and social interaction. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Mandelbaum, E. (2014). Thinking is believing. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 57(1), 55–96.
Manicas, P. (1998). A realist social science. Em Margaret Scotford Archer (ed.), Critical Realism: Essential Readings. Routledge. (pp. 313-38)
Marqués, N. (2020). Fake News dell'Antica Roma. Bibliotheka.
Maryanski, A. (2013). The secret of the hominin mind: an evolutionary story. Em Handbook of neurosociology (pp. 257 – 287). Springer.
Marie, A., Altay, S., & Strickland, B. (2020). The cognitive foundations of misinformation on science: What we know and what scientists can do about it. EMBO reports, 21(4), e50205. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202050205
McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological review, 102(3), 419–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.3.419
McGuire, W. J. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some contemporary approaches. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 191–229.
Moffitt, J. (2003). Picturing Extraterrestrials. Alien Images in Modern Mass Culture. Prometheus.
Nguyen, C. (2020). Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles. Episteme, 17(2), 141-161. doi:10.1017/epi.2018.32
Parks, C. M., & Toth, J. P. (2006). Fluency, familiarity, aging, and the illusion of truth. Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition, 13(2), 225–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/138255890968691
Pavlova, M., Heiz J., Sokolov A., Fallgatter, A., & Barisnikov, K. (2018). Even subtle cultural differences affect face tuning. Plos One, 13, e0198299.
Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Barr, N., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2015). On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(6), 549–563.
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019a). Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(7), 2521–2526. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806781116
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D.G. (2019b). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39-50.
Pereira, M. (2021). Estereótipos. Kindle Publishing.
Pigden, C. (2007) Conspiracy theories and the conventional wisdom. Episteme: A Journal of
Social Epistemology, 4, 2, 219–232. https://doi.org/10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.219
Pilgrim, D. (2020). Critical realism for psychologists. Routledge.
Prentice, D. & Miller, D. (2007). Psychological essentialism of human categories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 4, 202-206.
Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16(1),
–127. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242
Posetti, J., & Matthews, A. (2018). A short guide to the history of “fake news” and disinformation:A new ICFJ learning module. Retrieved November 2, 2019, from www.icfj.org/news/short-guide-history-fake-news-and-disinformation-new-icfj-learning-module
Reinhard, M.-A., & Sporer, S. L. (2008). Verbal and nonverbal behaviour as a basis for credibility attribution: The impact of task involvement and cognitive capacity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.07.012
Ritzer, G., & Gindoff, P. (1992). Methodological relationism: lessons for and from social psychology. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55,2, 128-128.
Ross, L., Lepper, M. & Hubbard, M. (1975). Perseverance in Self-Perception and Social Perception: Biased Attributional Processes In the Debriefing Paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 5, 680-892. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.32.5.880
Ross, L., & Ward, A. (1996). Naive realism in everyday life: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding. In E. S. Reed, E. Turiel, & T. Brown (Eds.), Values and knowledge (pp. 103–135). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Schoon, I., Cheng, H., Gale, C. R., Batty, G. D., & Deary, I. J. (2010). Social Status, Cognitive Ability, and Educational Attainment as Predictors of Liberal Social Attitudes and Political Trust. Intelligence, 38, 1, 144–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2009.09.005
Schwarz, N., & Jalbert, M. (2020). When news feels true: Intuitions of truth and the
acceptance and correction of misinformation. In R. Greifeneder, M. Jaffé, E. J. New-
man, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation (pp. 73–89). London: Routledge.
Shao, C., Ciampaglia, G., Varol,O., Yang, K., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2018) The spread of low-credibility content by social bots. Nature Communications, 9, 4787. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06930-7
Shermer, M. (1987). Why People Believe Weird Things. Henry Holt and Company.
Shin, J., Jian, L., Driscoll, K., & Bar, F. (2018). The diffusion of misinformation on social media: temporal pattern, message, and source. Computers in Human Behavior, 83, 278–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.008.
Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108–131.
Strauss, Barry (2022). The long history of disinformation during war. https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2022/04/28/long-history-misinformation-during-war/.Retrieved in 04 de julho de 2022.
Street, C. N., & Kingstone, A. (2017). Aligning Spinoza with Descartes: An informed
Cartesian account of the truth bias. British Journal of Psychology, 108(3), 453–466
Street, C. N., & Richardson, D. C. (2015). Descartes versus Spinoza: Truth, uncertainty,
and bias. Social Cognition, 33(3), 227–239.
Soll, J. (2016) The Long and Brutal History of Fake News, Politico Magazine. Retrieved 04/07/2022: https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/12/fake-news-history-longviolent-214535
Stabile, B., Grant, A., Purohit, H., & Harris, K. (2019). Sex, lies, and stereotypes: Gendered implications of fake news for women in politics. Public Integrity, 21(5), 491–502.
Sun, Y., Pan, Z., & Shen, L. (2008). Understanding the third-person perception: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 280–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00385.x
Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Em S. Worchel & W.G. Austin (Eds.). Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 7-24). Nelson-Hall Publishers.
Tandoc, E. C., Jr., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “fake news” a typology of
scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153.
Thornton, B. (2000). The moon hoax: Debates about ethics in 1835 New York newspapers. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 15, 89–100. doi: 10.1207/S15327728JMME1502_3
Törnberg P. (2018). Echo chambers and viral misinformation: Modeling fake news as complex contagion. PloS one, 13(9), e0203958. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203958
van der Linden, S., & Roozenbeek, J. (2020). A psychological vaccine against fake news.
In R. Greifeneder, M. Jaffé, E. J. Newman, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), The psychology of fake
news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation (pp. 147–169). Routledge.
Vicario, M.D., Quattrociocchi, W., Scala, A., & Zollo, F. (2019). Polarization and Fake News. ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB), 13, 1 - 22.
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science,359, 1146–1151. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559
von Hippel, W. (2019). A evolução improvável. Harper Collins.
von Hippel, W., & Trivers, R. (2011). The evolution and psychology of self-deception. The Behavioral and brain sciences, 34, 1, 1–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10001354
Ward, Jason (2001). The Fake News Campaign in Ancient Rome That Led to the First Emperor and the Deaths of Anthony and Cleopatra. History of Yesterday. https://historyofyesterday.com/the-fake-news-campaign-in-ancient-rome-that-led-to-the-first-emperor-and-the-deaths-of-anthony-and-d130564e1eb9. Retrieved in 04 de julho de 2022.
Wegner, D., & Bargh, J. (1998). Control and automaticity in social life. Em The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 446-496). McGraw-Hill.
Welles, Orson. War of the Worlds. The Mercury Theatre on Air.https://archive.org/details/OrsonWelles_MercuryTheatre/16+38-10-30+War+of+the+Worlds.mp3. Acessado em 18/07/2022
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Declaro(amos) que o artigo submetido é pessoal, inédito, não representando reprodução, ainda que parcial, de obras de terceiros, assumindo a responsabilidade por todas as colocações e conceitos emitidos, bem como também autorizo(amos) sua publicação pela revista Signo, Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul. Declaro(amos) exonerar a APESC/UNISC de todas e quaisquer responsabilidades, e indenizá-la por perdas e danos que venha a sofrer em caso de contestação (da originalidade e dos conceitos e ideias); Declaro(amos), caso o artigo seja aceito e publicado pela revista Signo, a cedência e transferência de forma definitiva e perpétua, irrevogável e irretratável, para a APESC, dos seus direitos autorais patrimoniais referentes ao artigo denominado nesta declaração, para utilização da APESC em finalidade educacional. Concordo(amos) e estou(amos) ciente(s) de que a publicação eletrônica é de livre acesso, regida com uma Licença Os autores que publicam na Signo retêm os direitos autorais de seu trabalho, licenciando-o sob a Creative Commons Attribution License que permite que os artigos sejam reutilizados e redistribuídos sem restrições, desde que o trabalho original seja corretamente citado. A Signo é propriedade da Associação Pró-Ensino em Santa Cruz do Sul e hospeda na plataforma Open Journal System. Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.
