An analysis of intermediate degree of metaphoricity occurrences of the deictic “here” in multimodal data

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17058/signo.v44i79.12846

Keywords:

Metaphoricity. Deixis. Here. Multimodality

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze two occurrences with an intermediate degree of prototipicality of the deictic “here” in multimodal data. These occurrences were extracted from the Distributed Little Red Hen Lab. From the theoretical point of view, we use the studies about Deixis in a cognitive perspective (MARMARIDOU, 2000), by anchoring, mostly, in the concept of Idealized Cognitive Models (LAKOFF, 1987,); Frames (FILLMORE, 1986 apud CIENKI, 2007); e Image Schemas (LAKOFF, 1987); (JOHNSON, 1987). Afterwards, we discuss about Gesture Modes of Representation (MÜLLER, 1998a, 1998b, 2014 apud CIENKI, 2017) and Pointing Gestures (KENDON, 2004). From the methodological point of view, we develop our analyses based on the Linguistic Annotation System for Gesture (LASG) (BRESSEM et al., 2013) and on the Metaphor Identification Guidelines for Gesture (MIG-G) (CIENKI, 2017). The results showed that the occurrences categorized as in intermediately prototypical refer to cases in which “here” is related to a broader locative context and have an in between iconic Mode of Representation between “Molding” and “Drawing”, as well as to cases in which the gesture performed can be categorized as being in between a Pointing Gesture and a Gesture Mode of Representation. In addition, we noticed that, regarding the Modes of Representation, it would be desirable that there be the Mode of Representation “Drawing” in 3D (not provided in original classification).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Hayat Passos Ferraz Pinheiro, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia

Mestre em Linguística pela Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia (UESB). Graduada em Letras Modernas pela Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia (UESB).

References

AVELAR, M.; FERRARI, L. Integração experiencial e dêixis: O papel discursivo dos gestos. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos v.59, n.1, Campinas, p. 73-89 - jan./abr. 2017.Disponívelem:https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/cel/article/view/8648300/15696 Acesso em: 01/09/18

BRESSEM, J. et al. A linguistic perspective on the notation of form features in gestures. In: MÜLLER, C.; CIENKI, A.; FRICKE, E.; LADEWIG, S.; MCNEILL, D.; TESSENDORF, S. (Eds.), Body - Language – Communication. v. 1. Berlin/Amsterdam/New York: De Gruyter Mouton, 2013, p. 1079-1098.

CIENKI, A. Analysing metaphor in gesture: A set of metaphor identification guidelines for gesture (MIG-G). In: E. Semino, & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 131-147). London: Routledge, 2017, pp. 131-147.

CIENKI, A. Frames, Idealized Cognitive Models, and Domains. In: GEERAETS, D.; CUYCKENS, H. (org.) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007, p. 170-187.

EVANS, V. The Cognitive Linguistics Reader. BENJAMIN K. Bergen e JÖRG Zinken (Eds.).Londres: Equinox Publishing Co, 2007, p. 40-41.

FERRARI, L. Introdução à Linguística Cognitiva. São Paulo: Contexto, 2011.

JOHNSON, M. The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press, 1987

KENDON, A. Gesture: visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004

LAKOFF, G. & JOHNSON, M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press, 1980.

LAKOFF, G. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press, 1987

MARMARIDOU, S. On Deixis. In: Pragmatic meaning and cognition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2000.

Published

2019-01-03

How to Cite

Pinheiro, H. P. F. (2019). An analysis of intermediate degree of metaphoricity occurrences of the deictic “here” in multimodal data. Signo, 44(79), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.17058/signo.v44i79.12846

Issue

Section

Metáforas Multimodais