What is the relationship between fake news’ power and deep reading comprehension level?

Authors

  • Letícia Priscila Pacheco Ph.D. Capes Grant Holder. Candidate from the Pontifical University of Rio Grande do Sul’s Linguistics Graduate Program (PPGL/PUCRS). EBTT Professor from Rio Grande do Sul’s Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology (IF Sul), Venâncio Aires Campus http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9937-5114
  • Lilian Cristine Hübner Assistant Professor of the Pontifical University of Rio Grande do Sul’s Linguistics Graduate Program (PPGL/PUCRS). Productivity fellow researcher (CNPQ) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7876-2211

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17058/signo.v47i90.17579

Keywords:

Fake news, reading comprehension, critical reading

Abstract

This paper discusses the role of deep reading comprehension in combating the endorsement and propagation of fake news. For this, we present a theoretical review on mechanisms for developing deep reading comprehension and critical reading skills and reflections on how fake news interacts with the collective thought and the unconscious of the reading public. We also suggest action possibilities for the improvement of the critical and competent reader through two journalistic texts published in digital media showing how information is presented in fake news. By identifying elements that can contribute to disseminating misleading information, we discuss how the manipulation of false narratives can influence the reading public. The analysis of the texts demonstrates how the social collective receives the fake news and takes it as accurate, intensifying the spread of disinformation. In this sense, it is vital to highlight the importance of deep reading to boost the critical capacity of the reader as a tool to stop the impact of fake news.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Letícia Priscila Pacheco, Ph.D. Capes Grant Holder. Candidate from the Pontifical University of Rio Grande do Sul’s Linguistics Graduate Program (PPGL/PUCRS). EBTT Professor from Rio Grande do Sul’s Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology (IF Sul), Venâncio Aires Campus

Professora de língua inglesa no IFSul, Campus Venâncio Aires, Doutoranda em Letras (linguística) na PUCRS.

Lilian Cristine Hübner, Assistant Professor of the Pontifical University of Rio Grande do Sul’s Linguistics Graduate Program (PPGL/PUCRS). Productivity fellow researcher (CNPQ)

Assistant Professor of the Pontifical University of Rio Grande do Sul’s Linguistics Graduate Program (PPGL/PUCRS). Productivity fellow researcher (CNPQ)

References

AMOSSY, R. Apologia da polêmica. São Paulo: Contexto, 2017

BAKHTIN, M. Os gêneros do discurso. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2016.

BARCLAY, D. A. Fake News, propaganda and plain old lies: how to find trustworthy information in the digital age. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2018.

BAUMAN, Z. Medo líquido. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2008.

BERNECKER, S., et al. The Epistemology of Fake News. Oxford Universisty Press, 2021.

CANALTECH. Disponível em: https://canaltech.com.br/seguranca/brasileiros-nao-sabem-reconhecer-fake-news-diz-pesquisa-160415/ acesso em 02/12/2021.

COELHO, C. L. G., & CORREA, J. Compreensão de leitura: habilidades cognitivas e tipos de texto. Psico, 48(1), 2017, p. 40-49.

CUNHA, V. L. da, et al. Relating between Fluency and Reading Comprehension in Students with Learning Difficulties. In: Psicologia Escolar e do Desenvolvimento. Psic.: Teor. e Pesq. 33, 2015.

DeFLEUR, M. L. & BALL-ROKEACH, S. Teorias da Comunicação de massa. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1993.

FARMER, L.S.J. Fake news in context. New York: Routledge, 2021.

GRIGORENKO, E. L.; NAPLES, A.J. (Ed.) Single-word reading: behavioral and biological perspectives. New York: Taylor & Francis Group, 2008.

GUINOTE, O. Educação e liberdade de escolha. Lisboa: FFMS, 2014.

LAGARDE, J. & HUDGINS, D. Fact vs. Fiction: Teaching Critical Thinking in the Age of Fake News. International Society for Technology in Education, 2018.

LYONS, B.A. et al. HOW BAD IS THE FAKE NEWS PROBLEM? The role of baseline information in public perceptions. In: Greifeneder, R. et al. The Psychology of Fake News: Accepting, sharing, and correcting missinformation. New York: Routledge, 2021.

MAINGUENEAU, D. Variações sobre o ethos. São Paulo: Parábola, 2020.

Mc GUINNESS, D. O ensino da leitura: o que a ciência nos diz sobre como ensinar a ler. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2006.

MORAIS, J. A arte de ler. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade Estadual Paulista, 1996.

MORAIS J. Criar leitores: para professores e educadores. Barueri: Minha Editora, 2013.

OAKHILL, J., et al. Understanding and teaching reading comprehension: a handbook. New York: Routledge, 2015.

PERFETTI, C. et al. The Psycholinguistics of Basic Literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 2001, p. 127–149.

SANTAELLA, L. A pós verdade é verdadeira ou falsa? [recurso eletrônico] Barueri: Estação das Letras e cores, 2018. (Ebook)

SMITH, F. Understanding reading: A Psycholinguistic Analysis Of Reading And Learning To Read. 6TH Edition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers, 2004.

SOARES, M. Linguagem e escola: uma perspectiva social. 2 ed. São Paulo: Ática, 1986.

TANDOC JR, E.C. Tools of Disinformation: How Fake News Gets to Deceive. In: Jayakumar, S. et al. Orgs. Disinformation and Fake News. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.

VOLÓCHINOV, V. A palavra na vida e a palavra na poesia: ensaios, artigos, resenhas e poemas. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2019.

WOLF, M. O cérebro no mundo digital: os desafios da leitura na nossa era. São Paulo: Contexto, 2019.

Published

2022-12-29

How to Cite

Pacheco, L. P., & Hübner, L. C. (2022). What is the relationship between fake news’ power and deep reading comprehension level?. Signo, 47(90), 26-37. https://doi.org/10.17058/signo.v47i90.17579