The argumentation and the discursive configuration of certainty in A Casa dos Budas Ditosos

Authors

  • Leonardo Alexander DO CARMO SILVA Université Sorbonne Nouvelle - Paris 3

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17058/signo.v42i73.7695

Keywords:

João Ubaldo Ribeiro. Brazilian litterature. Rhetoric. Persuasion. Argumentation.

Abstract

The novel A Casa dos Budas Ditosos is presented to readers as the transcript of the oral testimony of a libertine sexagenarian, identified only by the initials CLB. In what is probably his most outrageous and controversial work, João Ubaldo Ribeiro creates a complex and provocative author/orator’s character, which seeks to seduce and exercise power through discourse. Because the testimony has a Strong argumentative dimension and a persuasive purpose, we seek to study in this paper how is characterized the rhetoric of this libertine. Thus, we care for the argumentative strategies and rhetorical devices employed by the narrator throughout the novel. For this analysis, we will use as a theoretical basis Aristotle's Rhetoric and contemporary works such as Chaïm Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca's, as well as works on the semantics area, such as those of Bernard Pottier.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Leonardo Alexander DO CARMO SILVA, Université Sorbonne Nouvelle - Paris 3

Professor de português língua estrangeira na Université Sorbonne Nouvelle (Paris 3). Doutorando na Université Sorbonne Nouvelle – Paris 3 ; École Doctorale 122 – Europe Latine, Amérique Latine ; Centre de Recherches sur les Pays Lusophones (CREPAL), Paris, França – leonardoalexandersilva@gmail.com. Mestre em Literatura Comparada, pela Université Paris-Sorbonne, e mestre em Estudos Lusófonos, pela Université Sorbonne Nouvelle.

Published

2017-02-10

How to Cite

DO CARMO SILVA, L. A. (2017). The argumentation and the discursive configuration of certainty in A Casa dos Budas Ditosos. Signo, 42(73), 124-134. https://doi.org/10.17058/signo.v42i73.7695

Issue

Section

vol. 42, nº 73 – Linguagem e Argumentação