Evaluation of the carbon monoxide levels in staff of a general hospital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17058/reci.v1i1.8042Abstract
Backgrounds and Objective: Exposure to carbon monoxide (CO) can be harmful to human health and the first effects of intoxication may go unnoticed. Our objective was to evaluate the functional capacity and respiratory muscle strength of staff of a general hospital opposite the inhalation of carbon monoxide. Methods: cross-sectional study with a convenience sample. It was used as evaluation tools: clinical research roadmap; the MicroCO for analysis of CO concentration, CO cutoff for non-smokers among 1- 6ppm, light smokers 7-10ppm, moderate smokers 11-20ppm and heavy smokers >20ppm; the manometer to determine the respiratory muscle strength (MIP and MEP); Six minute walk test (6MWT) to evaluate functional capacity. Statistical analysis was performed hair Pearson correlation test to verify the association of variables. Results:The study included 14 volunteer subjects (08 men), mean age 35.14±8,76years, working in maintenance (n=5); laundry (n=6); kitchen (n=1); engineering (n=2) of the hospital. For active smokers only 03 subjects were above the cutoff (CO>6ppm) then being considered active smokers. The MIP (99.50±27.37% predicted) and MEP (105.64±21,39% predicted) are within normal parameters. The functional capacity of smokers (6MWT=71% of predicted), with high CO (17ppm), underperformed the baseline when compared with nonsmokers (CO=0,9ppm; 6MWT=92, 6% predicted). Moderate and negative correlation was observed between 6MWT and CO (r=-0.577, p=0.031). Conclusion: adult staff of a general hospital with preserved respiratory muscle strength and higher levels of CO exhaled have worse functional performance in the 6MWT. KEYWORDS:Muscle Strength. Carbon Monoxide.Occupational Health.Public Health.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author must state that the paper is original (has not been published previously), not infringing any copyright or other ownership right involving third parties. Once the paper is submitted, the Journal reserves the right to make normative changes, such as spelling and grammar, in order to maintain the language standard, but respecting the author’s style. The published papers become ownership of RECI, considering that all the opinions expressed by the authors are their responsibility. Because we are an open access journal, we allow free use of articles in educational and scientific applications provided the source is cited under the Creative Commons CC-BY license.