Reexamining the Kuznets Curve: evidence for Brazil in the period 1981-2009

Authors

  • Francisco Jose Silva Tabosa Universidade Federal do Ceará
  • Jair do Amaral Filho CAEN/UFC
  • Uyara Gomes Gomide CAEN/UFC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17058/redes.v21i2.5246

Keywords:

Kuznets Curve. Economic Growth. Income Inequality. Panel Data.

Abstract

The present study investigated the hypothesis of the Kuznets Curve in order to check if there is a "U Inverted" relationship between the income inequality and economic growth in Brazil in the period since 1981 to 2009. Through the econometrics of panel data (fixed effects, random effects and first difference), and using the linear form of average household income per capita, as a measure of economic growth, and the Gini and Theil indicators, for the measurement of income inequality, were estimated two models: the usual quadratic form, by Ahluwalia (1976 b), and a modification of the cubic form, by List and Gallet (1999). For a better understanding of the relationship between these two variables, the analysis was divided into three periods. Empirical evidence showed that, in general, the Kuznets hypothesis isn’t corroborated. From a theoretical analysis of the political, economic and social context experienced by Brazil in contemporaneity, it is believed that effective public policies that provide quality in basic social services are essential to avoid a new cycle of rising inequality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Francisco Jose Silva Tabosa, Universidade Federal do Ceará

Economista. Dr. Professor do Departamento de Economia Agrícola da Ufc e do Mestrado Acadêmico em Economia Rural (MAER/UFC)

Jair do Amaral Filho, CAEN/UFC

Economista. Dr. Professor do CAEN/UFC

Uyara Gomes Gomide, CAEN/UFC

Economista. Mestre pelo CAEN/UFC

Published

2016-05-09

How to Cite

Tabosa, F. J. S., Amaral Filho, J. do, & Gomide, U. G. (2016). Reexamining the Kuznets Curve: evidence for Brazil in the period 1981-2009. Redes , 21(2), 245-266. https://doi.org/10.17058/redes.v21i2.5246