Testar los estudios comparativos de planificación del territorio en América Latina: implicaciones teóricas y desafíos para el desarrollo regional.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17058/redes.v25i3.15249Palabras clave:
Planificación territorial. Análisis comparativo. Desarrollo regional. Sur Global. América Latina.Resumen
Hasta la fecha, los estudios comparados de planificación territorial se han enfocado prevalentemente en el continente europeo. Desde el final de los años ’80, un creciente número de estudios han contribuido a la proliferación de abordajes teóricos y metodológicos, así como a una mejor definición del objeto de estudio. Al mismo tiempo, la comparación orientada a otros países del mundo es menos frecuente, si se excluyen los ‘estériles’ reportes desarrollados por las organizaciones internacionales. Enfocado a investigar las razones que están detrás de este vacío empírico, el artículo analiza las implicaciones teóricas y los desafíos que emergen cuando se aplican en el Sur Global estructuras conceptuales y analíticas desarrolladas en el hemisferio Norte. Para hacer esto, el artículo hace hincapié en el rol que desarrolla el legado colonial, para luego argumentar la necesidad de ‘ir más allá de la eficiencia técnica’ de la planificación y considerar las relaciones dominantes de poder escondidas tras la aparente neutralidad de los sistemas de planificación y gobierno del territorio, en particular en contextos donde las desigualdades espaciales son más pronunciadas. En este sentido, el artículo sugiere considerar las prácticas informales paralelamente a las formales, como manera para entender mejor los elementos que estructuran los sistemas de planificación y gobierno del territorio en el Sur Global. En definitiva, testar los estudios comparativos de planificación territorial en América Latina puede ofrecer valor añadido al desarrollo regional, estableciendo una agenda regional para una planificación del territorio más integrada y cooperativa.Descargas
Citas
ABRAMO, Pedro. La ciudad com-fusa: Mercado y producción de la estructura urbana en las grandes metrópolis latinoamericanas. Eure, v. 38, n. 114, p. 35–69, 2012. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0250-71612012000200002
ADAMS, Neil; COTELLA, Giancarlo; NUNES, Richard (Eds). Territorial Development, Cohesion and Spatial Planning. Knowledge and Policy Development in an Enlarged EU. London and New York: Routledge, 2010. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203842973
ALLMENDINGER, Philip; TEWDWR-JONES, Mark (Eds). Planning futures: new directions for planning theory. London: Routledge, 2005. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203996195
BERISHA, Erblin; COTELLA, Giancarlo; JANIN RIVOLIN, Umberto; SOLLY, Alys. Spatial governance and planning systems and the public control of spatial development: A European typology. European Planning Studies, v. 1, n. 20, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1726295
CEC - COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies. Regional Development Studies, 28. Luxembourg: European Communities, 1997. ISBN 92-827-9752-X
CITIES ALLIANCE, An overview of national urban laws in Latin America and the Caribbean: case studies from Brazil, Colombia and Ecuador. Sao Pablo, Brazil: Cities Alliance, 2017. ISBN 9788585938901
CONNELL, Raewyn. Using southern theory: Decolonizing social thought in theory, research and application. Planning Theory, v. 13, n. 2, p. 210–223, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095213499216
CONNELL, R Raewyn. Decolonizing Sociology. Contemporary Sociology, v. 47, n. 4, p. 399–407, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094306118779811
COTELLA, Giancarlo. Governance territoriale comunitaria e sistemi di pianificazione: Riflessioni sull’allargamento ad est dell’Unione europea. Ph.D, Politecnico di Torino, Italy, 2009. DOI: 10.6092/polito/porto/2498743
COTELLA, Giancarlo; STEAD Dominic. Spatial planning and the influence of domestic actors. Some conclusions, disP, 186 (3), p. 77-83, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2011.10557146
COTELLA, G.; JANIN RIVOLIN, U. Europeizzazione del governo del territorio: un modello analitico. Territorio, v. 73, n. 2, p. 127–134, 2015. DOI: 10.3280/TR2015-073019
COTELLA, Giancarlo; JANIN RIVOLIN, Umberto; SANTANGELO, Marco. Transferring Good Territorial Governance Across Europe. Opportunities and Barriers. In: VAN WELL, Lisa; SCHMITT, Peter (Eds), Territorial Governance across Europe: Pathways, practices and prospects. London: Routledge, 2015. ISBN 9781138297043
DADOS, Nour; CONNELL, Raewyn. The Global South. Context, v. 11, n. 1, p. 12-13, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504212436479
DAVIES, H. W. E.; EDWARDS, D.; HOOPER, Alan John; PUNTER, John Vincent. Comparative study. In: DAVIES, H. W. E. (Ed.). Planning control in Western Europe. London, UK: HMSO, 1989, p. 409-442. ISBN: 0117520799, 9780117520790
DE SOTO, Hernando. The mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the west and fails everywhere else. London: Black Swan, 2001. ISBN 0-552-99923-7
ESPON. Governance of Territorial and Urban Policies from EU to Local Level ESPON Project 2.3.2, Final report. Luxembourg: ESPON, 2007.
ESPON. COMPASS – Comparative Analysis of Territorial Governance and Spatial Planning systems in Europe, Final report. Luxembourg: ESPON, 2019.
GALLAND, Daniel; ELINBAUM, Pablo. A “Field” Under Construction: The State of Planning in Latin America and the Southern Turn in Planning. disP - The Planning Review, v. 54, n. 1, p. 18–24, 2018a. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2018.1454665
GALLAND, Daniel; ELINBAUM, Pablo. Positioning Latin America within the Southern Turn in Planning: Perspectives on an “Emerging Field”. disP - The Planning Review, v. 54, n. 1, p. 48–54, 2018b. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2018.1454696
GIDDENS, Anthony. The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1984. ISBN 0-520-05292-7
HALL, Peter. A.; TAYLOR, Rosemary C. R. Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. In: MPIFG. Discussion paper 96/6. Available in: http://www.mpi-fg-koeln.mpg.de/pu/mpifg_dp/dp96-6.pdf. Accessed on: 12.11.2010.
HALL, Peter; TEWDWR-JONES, Mark. Urban and regional planning. London: Routledge, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351261883
HANTRAIS, Linda. International Comparative Research: Theory, Methods and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. ISBN 9780230217683
HOFFMAN, George Walter. Regional Development Strategy in Southeast Europe: A Comparative Analysis of Albania, Bulgaria, Greece, Romania and Yugoslavia. London: Praeger, 1972.
HOHN, Uta; NEUER, Birgit. New urban governance: Institutional change and consequences for urban development, European Planning Studies, v. 14, n. 3, p. 291–298, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500420750
JANIN RIVOLIN, Umberto. Conforming and performing planning systems in Europe: an unbearable cohabitation. Planning Practice & Research, v. 23, n. 2, p. 167–186, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450802327081
JANIN RIVOLIN, Umberto. Planning Systems as Institutional Technologies: a Proposed Conceptualization and the Implications for Comparison. Planning Practice and Research, v. 27, n. 1, p. 63-85, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.661181
KNIELING, Jörg; OTHENGRAFEN, Frank. (Eds). Planning Cultures in Europe: Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning. Farnham: Ashgate, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2011.616762
LARSSON, Gerhard. Spatial Planning Systems in Western Europe: An Overview. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2006. ISBN 978-1-60750-196-1
MAZZA, Luigi. Funzioni e sistemi di pianificazione degli uso del suolo. Urbanistica, v. 106, p. 104–107, 1996.
MONTERO, Sergio. Leveraging Bogotá: Sustainable development, global philanthropy and the rise of urban solutionism. Urban Studies, v. 00, n. 0, p. 1–19, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018798555
MORONI, Stefano. An evolutionary theory of institutions and a dynamic approach to reform, Planning Theory, v. 9, n. 4, pp. 275–297, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095210368778
MUÑOZ GIELEN, Demetrio; TASAN-KOK, Tuna. Flexibility in planning and the consequences for public-value capturing in UK, Spain and the Netherlands. European Planning Studies, v. 18, n. 7, p. 1097-1131, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654311003744191
NADIN, Vincent. International comparative planning methodology: Introduction to the theme issue. Planning Practice and Research, v. 27, n. 1, p. 1-5, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.669928
NADIN, Vincent; STEAD, Dominic. European spatial planning systems, social models and learning. disP - The Planning Review, v. 44, n. 172, p. 35-47, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2008.10557001
NEWMAN, Peter; THORNLEY, Andy. Urban Planning in Europe: International Competition, National Systems, and Planning Projects. London: Routledge, 1996. ISBN 9780415111799
NORTH, Douglass C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
PEEL, Deborah; FRANK, Andrea. Planning Education Forum: The internationalisation of planning education: Issues, perceptions and priorities for action. Town Planning Review, v. 79, n. 1, p. 87-123, 2008. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.79.1.6
QUIJANO, Anibal. Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South, v. 1, n. 3, P. 533-580, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005
QUIJANO, Anibal. De la dependencia histórico-estructural a la colonidad/descolonialidad del poder. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, 2014. ISBN 978-987-722-018-6
REIMER, Mario; GETIMIS, Panagiotis; BLOTEVOGEL, Hans Heinrich (Eds). Spatial Planning Systems and Practices in Europe: a Comparative Perspective on Continuity and Change, London: Routledge, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315852577
ROBINS, Steven. Whose modernity? Indigenous modernities and land claims after Apartheid. Development and Change, v. 34, n. 2, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00305
ROLAND, Gérard. Understanding Institutional Change: Fast-Moving and Slow-Moving Institutions. Studies in Comparative International Development, v. 38, n. 4, p. 109–131, 2004.
ROY, Ananya. The 21st-Century Metropolis: New geographies of theory. Regional Studies, v. 43, n. 6, p. 819–830, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701809665
SERVILLO, Loris Antonio; VAN DEN BROECK, Pieter. The Social Construction of Planning Systems: A Strategic-Relational Institutionalist Approach. Planning Practice and Research, v. 27, n. 1, p. 41–61, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.661179
SORENSEN, Andre. Taking path dependence seriously: an historical institutionalist research agenda in planning history. Planning Perspectives, v. 30, n. 1, p. 17–38, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2013.874299
SORENSEN, Andre. Land, property rights, and planning in Japan: Institutional design and institutional change in land management. Planning Perspectives, v. 25, n. 3, p. 279–302, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2010.481178
STEAD, Dominic. Best practices and policy transfer in spatial planning. Planning Practice and Research, v. 27, n. 1, p. 103-116, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2011.644084
TOSICS, Ivan; SZEMZŐ, Hanna; ILLÉS, Dora; GERTHEIS, Antal; LALENIS, Kostantinos; KALERGIS, Dimitris. National spatial planning policies and governance typology. In: Plurel Project Module 2 Report, 2010. Available at: www.plurel.net/images/D221.pdf.
UNITED NATIONS. Estado de las ciudades de América Latina y el Caribe: Rumbo a una nueva transición urbana, Nairobi: United Nations, 2012. ISBN Series 978-92-1-133397-8 ISBN; ISBN Volume 978-92-1-132469-3
UNITED NATIONS. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, Nairobi: United Nations, 2015.
WATSON, Vanessa. Conflicting rationalities: Implications for planning theory and ethics. Planning Theory and Practice, v. 4, n. 4, p. 395–407, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935032000146318
WATSON, Vanessa. Shifting Approaches to Planning Theory: Global North and South. Urban Planning, v. 1, n. 4, p. 32–41, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/up.v1i4.727
