Relevant and Possible Contributions of the Instinctive Theory of Language inherent to Biolinguistics and Pinker's Evolutionary Linguistics for the Programmatic Field of Psycholinguistics Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17058/signo.v43i77.11632Keywords:
Biolinguistics. Psycholinguistics. Evolutionary Linguistics. Instinctive Theory of Language and Natural Selection. Contributions of The Instinctive Theory of Language to The Psycholinguistics.Abstract
This article discusses how the instinctive theory of language postulated by Pinker (2002), under the precepts of Biolinguistics (MEADER & MUYSKENS, 1950/1962) and of Evolutionary Linguistics based on the Evolutionary Theory of Natural Selection (Darwin 1859/2003), can contribute to the theoretical-methodological development of Psycholinguistics (OSGOOD & SEBEOK, 1954) regarding its academic-scientific inquiries and how it can also favor - in less extension and range nowadays, however in more coverage capacity in next times - in the inventory and description of psycholinguistics phenomena underlying cognitive activity, as well as at a detailed explanation of cognitive principles inherent to exercise of faculty of language through linguistic communication performed by human beings throughout solid, biological and organic foundation. For this, initially it will be considered a historical analysis and a characterization of two important specialized areas of Linguistics intimately harmonized with the Generativism or Generative Linguistics (CHOMSKY, 1955/1975, 1957): Psycholinguistics (OSGOOD & SEBEOK, 1954) and Biolinguistics (MEADER & MUYSKENS, 1950/1962) so that there may then be, in the sequence, the discussion of how the instinctive theory of language is able to subsidize the development of the psycholinguistic field. In sum, it is checked the potency that those interdisciplinary fields to Psycholinguistics own so as to let a theory of language acquisition and processing which has its guidelines and defining principles supported over the factors that allowed the birth and evolution of the language until today and on the biologic bases which enabled and that continue facilitating that process along the time.Downloads
References
BLOOMFIELD, Leonard. Language history: from Language (1933). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1965.
BOECKX, Cedric; GROHMANN, Kleanthes K. The biolinguistics manifesto. Biolinguistics, Nicosia, v. 1, p. 1-8, 2007.
SCLIAR-CABRAL, Leonor. Introdução à psicolingüística. São Paulo: Ática, 1991.
CÂMARA JR., Joaquim Mattoso. História da linguística. 7. ed. Trad. Maria do Amparo Barbosa de Azevedo. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2011.
CEZARIO, Maria Maura; MARTELOTTA, Mário Eduardo. Aquisição da linguagem. In: MARTELOTTA, Mário Eduardo (Org.). Manual de linguística. 2. ed. São Paulo: Contexto, 2012. p. 207-216.
______; VOTRE, Sebastião. Sociolinguística. In: MARTELOTTA, Mário Eduardo (Org.). Manual de linguística. 2. ed. São Paulo: Contexto, 2012. p. 141-155.
CHOMSKY, Noam. Approaching UG from below. In: SAUERLAND, Uli; GÄRTNER, Hans-Martin (Eds.). Interfaces + recursion = language? Chomsky’s minimalism and the view from syntax-semantics. Berlim: Mouton de Gruyter, 2007a. p. 1-30.
______. Of minds and language. Biolinguistics, Nicosia, v. 1, p. 9-27, 2007b.
______. Three factors in language design. Linguistic inquiry, Cambridge: MA, v. 36, n. 1, p. 1-22, 2005.
______. Syntactic structures (1957). 2nd ed. Berlim: Walter de Gruyter, 2002.
______. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. Westport: Praeger, 1986.
______. Logical structure of linguistic theory (LSLT) (1955). Ms. Parts of 1956 revision published in New York and London: Plenum Press, 1975; Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.
______. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1965.
CORRÊA, Letícia Maria Sicuro. Possíveis diálogos entre Teoria Lingüística e Psicolingüística: questões de processamento, aquisição e do déficit específico da linguagem. In: MIRANDA, Neusa Salim; NAME, Maria Cristina Lobo (Orgs.). Lingüística e Cognição. Juiz de Fora: Editora da UFJF, 2005. p. 221-244.
COSTA, Marcos Antonio. Estruturalismo. In: MARTELOTTA, Mário Eduardo (Org.). Manual de linguística. 2. ed. São Paulo: Contexto, 2012. p. 113-126.
DARWIN, Charles. A origem das espécies (1859). Porto: Lello & Irmão, 2003.
DI SCIULLO, Anna Maria et. al. The biological nature of human language. Biolinguistics, Nicosia, v. 4, n. 1, p. 4-34, 2010.
FERRARI-NETO, José; SILVA, Cláudia Roberta Tavares (Orgs.). Programa Minimalista em foco: princípios e debates. Curitiba, PR: CRV, 2012.
FURTADO DA CUNHA, Angélica. Funcionalismo. In: MARTELOTTA, Mário Eduardo (Org.). Manual de linguística. 2. ed. São Paulo: Contexto, 2012. p. 157-176.
______; COSTA, Marcos Antonio; MARTELOTTA, Mário Eduardo. Linguística. In: MARTELOTTA, Mário Eduardo (Org.). Manual de linguística. 2. ed. São Paulo: Contexto, 2012. p. 15-29.
HARLEY, Trevor A. The psychology of language: from data to theory. 3rd ed. Hove: Psychology Press, 2008.
JENKINS, Lyle. Exploring the Biology of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
KENEDY, Eduardo. Gerativismo. In: MARTELOTTA, Mário Eduardo (Org.). Manual de linguística. 2. ed. São Paulo: Contexto, 2012. p. 127-140.
LEITÃO, Márcio Martins. Psicolinguística experimental: focalizando o processamento da linguagem. In: MARTELOTTA, Mário Eduardo (Org.). Manual de linguística. 2. ed. São Paulo: Contexto, 2012. p. 217-234.
LENNEBERG, Eric H.; CHOMSKY, Noam; MARX, Otto. Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley, 1967.
LEWONTIN, Richard Charles. A tripla hélice: gene, organismo e ambiente. Trad. J. Viegas Filho. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2002.
LONGA, Víctor M. Genes, lenguaje e innatismo: algunas precisiones. Letras, Lima, v. 84, n. 119, p. 99-122, 2014.
MAIA, Marcus (Org.). Psicolinguística, psicolinguísticas: uma introdução. São Paulo: Contexto, 2015.
MARTELOTTA, Mário Eduardo. Manual de linguística. 2. ed. São Paulo: Contexto, 2012.
______. Conceitos de gramática. In: MARTELOTTA, Mário Eduardo (Org.). Manual de linguística. 2. ed. São Paulo: Contexto, 2012. p. 43-70.
______; PALOMANES, Roza. Linguística cognitiva. In: MARTELOTTA, Mário Eduardo (Org.). Manual de linguística. 2. ed. São Paulo: Contexto, 2012. p. 177-192.
MATOS, Francisco Gomes de. Introdução à (Bio)linguística: linguagem e mente. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada, São Paulo, v. 27, n. 1, p. 169-173, 2011.
MEADER, Clarence L.; MUYSKENS, John H. Handbook of biolinguistics (1950). Toledo: Herbert C. Weller, 1962.
OLIVEIRA, Mariangela Rios de. Linguística textual. In: MARTELOTTA, Mário Eduardo (Org.). Manual de linguística. 2. ed. São Paulo: Contexto, 2012. p. 193-204.
______; WILSON, Victoria. Linguística e ensino. In: MARTELOTTA, Mário Eduardo (Org.). Manual de linguística. 2. ed. São Paulo: Contexto, 2012. p. 235-242.
OSGOOD, Charles E.; SEBEOK, Thomas A. Psycholinguistics: a survey of theory and research problems. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Washington: DC, v. 49, n. 4, p 1-203, 1954.
______; ______ (Eds.). Psycholinguistics: A survey of theory and research problems. 2 ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1965a.
______; ______ (Eds.). Psycholinguistics: A survey of theory and research problems with a survey of psycholinguistic research, 1954-1964, by A. Richard Diebold and the psycholinguists, by George A. Miller. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1965b.
PINKER, Steven. O instinto da linguagem: como a mente cria a linguagem. Trad. Claudia Berliner. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2002.
______; BLOOM, Paul. Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and brain sciences, New York, v. 13, n. 4, p. 707-727, 1990.
RATTOVA, Sidriana Scheffer. A recursividade no sistema sintático subjacente à faculdade da linguagem. 2014. 81 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Letras) – Faculdade de Letras, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2014.
ROSA, Maria Carlota. Introdução à (bio)linguística: linguagem e mente. São Paulo: Contexto, 2013.
SAUSSURE, Ferdinand de. Curso de linguística geral (1916). 27. ed. São Paulo: Cultrix, 2006.
TINBERGEN, Niko. On aims and methods of ethology (1963). (Reprinted from Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie, vol. 20, pg. 410, 1963), Animal Biology, Leiden, v. 55, n. 4, p. 297-321, 2005.
MILLER, George A. Language and communication. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1951.
______; CHOMSKY, Noam. Finitary models of language users. In: LUCE, Robert Duncan; BUSH, Robert R.; GALANTER, Eugene. (Eds.). In: Handbook of Mathematical Psychology. New York: Wiley, 1963. v. 1.
______; SELFRIDGE, Jennifer A. Verbal context and the recall of meaningful material. The American Journal of Psychology, Champaign, v. 63, n. 2, p. 176 185, 1950.