Reading processing, metacognitve strategies and teaching: revisiting the themes

Authors

  • Rejane Croharé Dania Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17058/signo.v43i77.12022

Keywords:

Reading, reading processing, metacognitive strategies.

Abstract

In the light of psycholinguistics, the article investigates reading, reading processing and the use of metacognitive strategies in the Brazilian school context. The research aimed at two groups of the eighth grade of a public school in Florianópolis, SC, Brazil in 2005. In order to carry it out four instruments were applied: (1) the identification questionnaire in order to collect information related to name, place and date of birth and if students had repeatead any grade before; (2) the psycosociolinguistic questionnarie to find out reading and writing habits of the participants; (3) the pre-test to evaluate reading performance before intervention and (4) the post-test to evalute reading performance after intervention. The results of PISA (Programme of International Student Assessment, 2000) and of the INAF (Índice Nacional de Analfabetismo Funcional, 2001, 2003, 2005) served as base for this research and showed that Brazilians read, but are limited to locate and recover explicit information. The alternative hypothesis affirms that students submitted to a programme of devolopment of metacognitive strategies achieve a better reading performance. The data served to test the hypothesis after the quantitative, statistic and qualitative analysis. The quantitative results of the post-test showed that there was variability on the scores. The statistical analysis enabled the confirmation that there was a significative difference between pre and post- tests. It was possible to confirm the alternative hypothesis of this research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BAKER , L. ; BROWN, A. Cognitive monitoring in reading. IN; FLOOD, J.(Org.) Understanding reading comprehension: cognition, language and the structure of prose. Newark, Delaware: IRA., 1984.

BROWN, A. Metacognitive skills and Reading. In: PEARSON, D. (Org.). Handbook of reading research. New York: Logman, 1980. p.353–394.

DANIA, R.C. “Professora, eu não sei ler!”: Uma contribuição para minimizar a produção de analfabetos funcionais. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística. Tese, 2007.

FAERCH, C; KASPER, G. Processes and strategies in foreign language learning and comunnication, 1980. In: FUJITA, M. et. al. Estratégias de Leitura. Disponível em < http://www.prudent.unesp.br/dcartog/arlete/hparlete/couseware/estrategias.htm>. Acesso em : 06 mai.2005.

GOODMAN, K. Reading; a psycholinguistic guessing game. In: H.Singer & R.B. Ruddel (Org.). Theorical Models and Processes of Reading. Newark: International Reading Association, 1976, p. 497- 508.

GOUGH, P.B. One second of reading. In: H.Singer & R.B. Ruddel (Org.). Theorical

Models and Processes of Reading. Newark: International Reading Association, 1976. p.509–535.

INAF. 5º Indicador Nacional de Alfabetismo Funcional – Um diagnóstico para a

inclusão social pela educação (Avaliação de Leitura e Escrita). São Paulo: IBOPE/Instituto Paulo Montenegro/Ação Educativa, 2005. Disponível em

<http://www.ipm.org.br/download/inaf05.pdf>. Acesso em: 09 set.2005.

KATO, M.A. No mundo da escrita: uma perspectiva psicolingüística . São Paulo: Ática, 1986.

LABERGE , D.; SAMUELS, S. Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology. n.6, p.293-323, 1974.

MORAIS, J. A Arte de ler. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade Estadual Paulista, 1996.

MORAIS, J.; KOLINSKY, R. A Ciência cognitiva da leitura e a alfabetização. Pátio, São Paulo, n.29, p.14-17, 2004.

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. Programme for International Student Assessment. Sample tasks from PISA 2000 assessment of reading, mathematical and scientific literacy. Paris: OECD Publications, 2002.

OXFORD, S. Language learning strategies: what every teacher should know, 1989. In: FUJITA et al., 2001. Disponível em

http://www.prudent.unesp.br/dcartog/arlete/hparlete/couseware/estrategias.htm>. Acesso em : 06 mai.2005.

SCLIAR-CABRAL, L. Processos psicolingüísticos de leitura e a criança. Letras de Hoje, n.19, p.27-113, 1986.

________________¬¬¬. Princípios do sistema alfabético do português do Brasil. São

Paulo: Contexto,2003 a.

_______________. Guia Prático de alfabetização, baseado em Princípios do sistema alfabético do português do Brasil. São Paulo: Contexto, 2003 b.

SOARES, M. Letramento: como definir, como avaliar, como medir. In: SOARES, M.

Letramento: um tema em três gêneros. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica, 1998, p.61-125.

______. Alfabetização e Letramento. São Paulo: Contexto, 2003.

Published

2018-05-02

How to Cite

Dania, R. C. (2018). Reading processing, metacognitve strategies and teaching: revisiting the themes. Signo, 43(77), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.17058/signo.v43i77.12022

Issue

Section

Processamento e aprendizagem de leitura e de escrita