Legal Norm of Maria da Penha Law in Action:Cognitive-Pragmatic Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17058/signo.v42i73.7916Keywords:
Cognitive Pragmatics. Goal Conciliation Theory. Legal Norm.Abstract
Guided by the theoretical notion of goal conciliation (RAUEN, 2014), we analyze how one deals with the legal norm of Maria da Penha Law in a case of offering representation against an aggressor and requesting protective measures to the victim. Accordingly, we present brief notes on goal conciliation theory, analyze the legal norm of the Maria da Penha Law, and verify how this legal norm rules an argument in an initial petitioning. The analysis suggests that the lawyer organizes the text around the legal norm, qualifying the represented as a transgressor of the default norm in the section of facts, outlining penalties for transgression in the section of rights, and requesting protective measures in the section of petitions following those premises. The analysis also suggests the text acts as enabling antefactual abductive hypothesis, allowing the judge to make similar inferences and to defer the protective measures by the logical force of the conjunction of facts with the text of the Law.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2017-02-10
How to Cite
Rauen, F. J., & Ribeiro, A. C. S. (2017). Legal Norm of Maria da Penha Law in Action:Cognitive-Pragmatic Analysis. Signo, 42(73), 184-199. https://doi.org/10.17058/signo.v42i73.7916
Issue
Section
vol. 42, nº 73 – Linguagem e Argumentação